Commitment, Passion, Results.
In Langham v. Noyd, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of qualified immunity to a police officer who waited 36 days to obtain a warrant to search a seized cellphone. The panel held that the delay violated the Fourth Amendment because it was longer than reasonably necessary under clearly established law. The court relied in …
Continue reading "Ninth Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity Over 36-Day Warrant Delay"
Most people assume a “mild” traumatic brain injury is minor. It isn’t. In medical terms, “mild” refers only to how the injury presents in the first hours after a crash — not how it may affect someone months or years later. After a car accident, many people diagnosed with a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) …
Continue reading "Mild vs. Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Why “Mild” Doesn’t Mean Minor"
No parent expects a safety feature to cause harm. When an airbag deploys during a crash, and a child is injured, the shock can feel overwhelming and confusing. Many families are left asking how this happened, whether it could have been prevented, and what steps they should take next. This article explains the risks airbags …
Continue reading "The Hidden Risk of Airbags for Children After a Car Accident"
| Auto accidents, Legal News, Personal Injury
Division Eight of the California Court of Appeal vacated a nearly $14 million jury verdict in a personal injury lawsuit involving a low-impact traffic accident after finding the trial court improperly allowed a late-disclosed expert to testify. The plaintiff disclosed a new spinal surgeon just seven court days before trial without seeking court permission or …
Continue reading "Court of Appeal Vacates $14M Verdict for Expert Disclosure Violation"
| Auto accidents, Catastrophic Injuries
High-speed car accidents are a leading cause of catastrophic injuries in California. When vehicles collide at high speeds, the force of impact can cause permanent, life-altering harm, and even death—even when seatbelts and airbags are in use. Why High-Speed Car Accidents Cause Catastrophic Injuries High-speed crashes expose the body to extreme forces in a fraction …
Continue reading "Catastrophic Injuries From High-Speed Car Accidents"
After a car accident, it’s common to receive two repair estimates that don’t look anything alike. In an insurance estimate vs body shop estimate comparison, the insurance estimate often comes in much lower than what a body shop finds during a hands-on inspection. That gap can feel frustrating or unfair, especially when you’re already dealing …
Continue reading "Why Insurance Estimates Are Lower Than Body Shop Estimates"
Division Six of the California Court of Appeal recently clarified how Code of Civil Procedure §473(b) applies when a party fails to appear for trial. The court held that discretionary relief may be available, even after an uncontested trial, but the statute’s mandatory relief provision does not apply in that situation. The case arose after …
Continue reading "Court of Appeal Clarifies CCP §473(b) Relief After an Uncontested Trial"
After a crash, drivers often say, ‘I didn’t see them.’ In California, that claim usually brings visibility into focus, and window tint accident risk becomes an issue when fault is questioned in serious accidents. Understanding how window tint affects visibility and how California law treats it can help explain why this issue matters after a …
Continue reading "How Window Tint Can Affect Visibility and Accident Risk in California"
| Auto accidents, Legal News, Personal Injury
Tavares v. Zipcar Inc. (2026). A California appeals court ruled that a car-sharing company that lets members unlock cars remotely (using a phone or membership card) is not legally responsible when one of its members drives drunk and causes a crash. Tavares v. Zipcar Inc. (2026). The court said the company does not have a …
Continue reading "Remote Car-Sharing Company Zipcar Not Responsible for Drunk Driver’s Crash"
A recent Court of Appeal decision underscores a reality seasoned litigators already understand: personal-injury law rewards precision, experience, and a deep command of procedural strategy. In a significant ruling, Division One of the Court of Appeal reversed a trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest to a prevailing personal-injury plaintiff, clarifying the proper application of Code …
Continue reading "A Requirement that the Insurance Company Consent to a C.C.P. §998 Offer Is Valid"
I called this law firm seeking for a personal injury attorney. They redirected me to RMD law and they handled my case in no time. Thanks for your recommendation and caring about people although it was out of your scope.
Ali G., Irvine, CA
