For personal injury litigators, establishing a transportation network company’s (TNC) liability for an injured passenger requires proving both a breach of the standard of care and a direct, foreseeable causal link to the harm. While the plaintiff’s bar continues to push for an expansion of rideshare liability—often arguing that tech platforms owe a heightened duty …
Continue reading "Rideshare Liability and Proximate Cause: The Limits of Duty in TNC Litigation"
In personal injury practice, we often view DUI cases through the lens of a standard motor vehicle accident. However, the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Porio v. Barbari (2026) serves as a critical reminder that a DUI arrest is often the beginning of a complex liability chain—one that can involve civil rights violations, medical negligence, …
Continue reading "Complex DUI Litigation: Navigating the Intersection of Civil Rights and PI"
| Legal News, Premises Liability
In premises liability law, the existence of a dangerous condition does not automatically establish a duty to warn. A recent California Court of Appeal decision underscores how the open and obvious doctrine operates as a limitation on that duty. Cohen v. Chandra Hospitality (2026). For attorneys handling premises liability claims, the decision provides useful guidance …
Continue reading "Open and Obvious Doctrine in Premises Liability Cases"
Can a single word in a sworn report be enough to support a license suspension? A recent California decision suggests it can. While the case arose from a DUI arrest and alleged refusal to submit to chemical testing, the broader question centers on what satisfies statutory requirements for “all relevant information.” Garcia v. Gordon (2026). …
Continue reading "How Courts Evaluate Sworn Reports in DMV License Suspensions"
A recent Ninth Circuit decision examines the limits of causation in personal injury claims, particularly when an initial incident is followed by a series of intervening events. Although the case involved damage to a passenger’s wheelchair during air travel, the court’s analysis focuses on a broader question: At what point does the connection between a …
Continue reading "Proximate Cause and Attenuated Injury Claims: Where Liability Ends"
A recent California appellate decision examines a recurring Fourth Amendment question: when does a vehicle impoundment, though authorized by statute, become constitutionally unreasonable? The issue arose in the context of a routine traffic stop that led to an inventory search and subsequent criminal charges. People v. Perez (2026). For attorneys, the case highlights an important …
Continue reading "Defining the Limits of Vehicle Impoundment Under the Fourth Amendment"
A recent California appellate decision addresses a recurring issue in administrative law: whether due process is violated when a hearing officer both develops the evidentiary record and rules on objections during the same proceeding. The issue arose in the context of a DMV administrative license suspension hearing, but the principles extend to administrative adjudications more …
Continue reading "Due Process in Administrative Hearings: Focus on Risk of Bias"
A recent action by the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) highlights questions surrounding the boundaries of appropriate judicial conduct and how such issues may affect confidence in the judiciary. Formal proceedings have been initiated against a Los Angeles Superior Court judge based on allegations of misconduct, bias, and failure to perform judicial duties over multiple …
Continue reading "Judicial Discipline Action Highlights Boundaries of Courtroom Conduct"
A recent California Court of Appeal decision reinforces a fundamental rule in media and contract law: an unsolicited idea, even if later used, does not create a right to payment without mutual agreement. In Greer v. Carlson (2025), the court affirmed dismissal of claims brought by a self-described author and physician who alleged that Tucker …
Continue reading "Court of Appeal Rejects “Idea Theft” Claim Over Unsolicited Media Pitches"
A recent California Court of Appeal decision addresses a recurring procedural issue in contingent-fee litigation: how attorneys enforce competing liens against settlement proceeds. In Jacobs v. Papez (2026), the Third District held that an attorney may pursue a single declaratory relief action against both the client and a competing attorney, without first litigating the lien …
Continue reading "Attorney Liens May Be Resolved Against Client and Competing Counsel in One Action"
The team here is the most professional group of people I have ever worked with. They took care of me from day one and made sure that I was included and understood every step of the process. Gaby checked in regularly to make sure treatment was going well and to give me updates about my case. The team here really shows that they care for their clients and make sure that you are compensated for all your troubles.
Michel G., East Los Angeles, CA
